Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Testing dependence in a 2x2 table for clustered observations

From   "Hoogendoorn, Adriaan" <>
To   "" <>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Testing dependence in a 2x2 table for clustered observations
Date   Mon, 6 Sep 2010 13:04:40 +0200

Thank you, Steve, Paul, Joseph and Joseph for your comments in this thread.

Things change dramatically if all patients at clinics are either all treated or all untreated (clinics are randomly assigned), as in the code below:

Do you have any idea what to do in this case?

clear *
set more off
set seed `=date("2010-08-26", "YMD")'
set obs 20
generate byte clinic = _n

* Half the clinics use treatment
generate treatment = (_n<=10)

* Average of 8 observations per centre
gen n = int(runiform()*8+.5)
expand n

* 20% recovery rate
gen recovered = runiform() < .2

cs recovered treatment , by(clinic) or
mhodds recovered treatment , by(clinic)
xtlogit recovered treatment, i(clinic) fe or nolog
xtlogit recovered treatment, i(clinic) re or nolog

Kind regards,
Adriaan Hoogendoorn
GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam

Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als dit bericht niet voor u bestemd is, wordt u verzocht dit aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te vernietigen. Het is niet toegestaan de inhoud van dit bericht verder te verspreiden of te gebruiken. Voor meer informatie over GGZ inGeest:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index