Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: nlsur and estout

From   Thoms <>
Subject   Re: st: RE: nlsur and estout
Date   Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:37:35 +0100

your answer was very helpful. But only after I added the noeqlines option I realized that the problemis bigger.

As I explained below because of the way that the e(b) after nlsur is labelled esttab seems to believe there are two coefficients for every single coefficient.



On 26/08/2010 16:50, Martin Weiss wrote:

Anything wrong with yesterday`s answer?


-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of Thoms
Sent: Donnerstag, 26. August 2010 16:40
Subject: st: nlsur and estout

I am trying to use esttab after nlsur.

nlsure outputs an e(b) matrix that looks like this:

b0:         b1:         b2:         b3:         b4:	b5:         b6:
_cons       _cons       _cons       _cons       _cons    _cons       _cons
y1   .84215046   .14613943   .00456665  -.00017402   .00006599  -1.640e-06

Now esttab produces a table like this

_cons     .84215046

thinking that there are 12 (instead of six) parameters/rows. How can I
work around this?
I tried using the parameters option for nlsur but I get an error "not

Many thanks,

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index