Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: interpreting negative and positive AIC- OLS VS. GLM

From   Arina Viseth <arina@UDel.Edu>
Subject   st: interpreting negative and positive AIC- OLS VS. GLM
Date   Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:57:54 -0400 (EDT)

Dear Statalist,

I am trying to run a regression on unemployment rates, I compare OLS output with fractional logit estmates (since the unemployment rate is bounded between zero and one). To assess goodness of fit of the models, I get AIC (OLS) is negative 1004 while AIC (glm)*number of observations is positive 169. My interpretation is that the standard linear model is a better fit than the fractional logit model since -1004 is smaller than 169. I have 144 observations and 9 observations hit the boundary at zero. No observations hit 1.

- Is this a fair interpretation? 

In advance, thank you very much for your answer,

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index