Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: assign several lines of syntax to local?


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: assign several lines of syntax to local?
Date   Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:09:56 +0100

I can't think of a good reason for saying that unless it's that people may get confused. Stata has no problems distinguishing a local macro and a command with the same name. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Martin Weiss

It is not a good idea to use an official command name for the -local-, anyway...

Maarten buis

--- On Thu, 12/8/10, Jeph Herrin wrote:
> Strange, I thought this would work:
> 
> ***************
>    sysuse auto
>    local test count ; list in 1 ;
>    #delimit ;
>    `test'
> ***************
> 
> but it doesn't produce so much as an error message. Why
> not?

That probably has to do with the way Stata parses a line.
My guess would be that the following is happening:
Stata collects a line till it sees a ; 
only after that does it start evaluating the locals
Since you did not put a ; after `test', Stata never
even started evaluating the local, and so never saw
the contents of `test', and thus did not produce an
error message.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index