Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Is this a situation for mlogit? xt-flavor of mlogit?

From   "Ploutz-Snyder, Robert (JSC-SK)[USRA]" <>
To   "" <>
Subject   st: Is this a situation for mlogit? xt-flavor of mlogit?
Date   Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:40:08 -0500

Stata Colleagues;

I'm at a loss for how to analyze the following data and am looking for suggestions.  Everything that I think of seems to have flaws... maybe I'm over thinking things a bit?  Maybe  I just need more coffee?

Experimental Design: 3(times)x2(groups)x4(celltypes) mixed factorial. (random ID: repeated on time & celltypes)

More specifically
   ->Blood data are collected from children at roughly three times per child (varname = age).  
          (Experimental protocol was to collect data at approx 12, 18 & 24 months of age, 
           but we have true age recorded in the dataset. There are some missing data.)

   ->Two groups of kids (independent measures factor. Varname = group)

   ->At each of the three repeated times, my outcomes data are the proportion of cells 
     belonging to each of 4 categories.  Thus the 4 "categories" of blood cells total to 1 (within 
     rounding error) per child, per time point.  (varname=y)

We want to examine/compare the effects of group, age  and group#age on the distribution among the 4 cell type.

I don't typically work with this kind of data, but I think it is a situation in which mlogit would be appropriate, Yes?

If so, is there an xt flavor of mlogit that would be better than mlogit with robust errors?


*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index