Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Joint Wald test after NLSUR


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: Joint Wald test after NLSUR
Date   Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:41:02 +0200

<>

***********
sysuse auto, clear
nlsur (turn  = {a1}*length  + {a2}*( {c} + weight  )  )  (price =
{b1}*length  + {b2}*( {c} + weight  )  )
te (_b[a2:_cons]=0) (_b[b2:_cons]=0)
***********


HTH
Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Regio Martins
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2010 00:16
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Joint Wald test after NLSUR

Dear Statalisters,

After the following NLSUR estimation:

nlsur (y1 = {a1}*x1 + {a2}*( {c} + x2 )  )  (y2 = {b1}*x1 + {b2}*( {c} + x2
)  )

how do I test the joint hypothesis that {a2} and {b2} are zero using the
"test" command? I cannot find the right syntax to refer to these two
parameters...

Thank you,
Regio
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index