Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:st: Re: test for exogeneity


From   Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re:st: Re: test for exogeneity
Date   Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:22:32 -0400

<>
On Jul 25, 2010, at 2:33 AM, Jing wrote:

> i am going to test the endogeneity of x1 x2 x3 (all of them are might-be endogenous variables). what if not all the variables are endogenous? does that matter if i put all the three variables in the ()? e.g.
> 
> to test the endogeneity of x1: xtivreg2 dep (x1 x2 x3 = excluded instruments), fe endog(x1).
> 
> from your perspective, by doing so, i am testing x1 while treating both x2 and x3 as endogenous. if x2 or x3 is however exogenous, does this command still work well?

You can rerun the command using different combinations in the endog() option. Put all the x's in there, and you test whether you need IV at all. Put one or two in, and you're questioning whether they must be instrumented, while letting the other(s) stay endogenous. In all cases you are contrasting with the model where they all are endogenous, which if the model is specified correctly is consistent.

Kit



Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |   http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
                              An Introduction to Stata Programming  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
   An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index