Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: fixed vs random effect model


From   amatoallah ouchen <at.ouchen@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: fixed vs random effect model
Date   Sun, 4 Jul 2010 19:31:22 +0200

David, David and Martin Thank you very much  for you  time and answers,
what makes me thought about using random instead than fixed  in
addition to the little variation issue is that when i'm running random
effects, i got very significant results which are very compatible with
the economic theory. This is why  i've asked if  it is  possible to
makethe  tradeoff of  loosing in efficiency for winning in
consistancy.

Ama
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index