Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: why -recode-takes longer than -replace-


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: why -recode-takes longer than -replace-
Date   Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:31:46 +0200

<>

-replace- is built-in while -recode- is ado code, for one: Just -which- the
two.


HTH
Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Amanda Fu
Sent: Sonntag, 27. Juni 2010 22:11
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st:why -recode-takes longer than -replace-

Dear Statalisters,

I am just curious about a fact noticeable when I use -recode- (1 as
following) or -replace- (2 as following)  to recode all the variables
in a data set (size :  52,996,616) using Stata 10.1 SE: the recode
command  takes much longer than replace. I was wondering what causes
the speed difference and if the speed difference implies for large
data set it would be better to use replace instead of recode.

1.  slower
.recode _all (8=.) (9=.)

2. faster
foreach v of varlist * {
.replace `v'=. if `v'==8 | `v'==9
}
end

Thanks for your time!

Sincerely,
Amanda
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index