Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: gllamm versus xtmelogit?


From   Anders Alexandersson <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: gllamm versus xtmelogit?
Date   Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:38:39 -0400

model is a random intercept model for a continuous outcome but you
wanted a random slope model for a logistic outcome. You need something
more similar to this (not tested):

. gen cons = 1
. eq slope: perblack_1980
. gllamm infdeath black, i(countynumber) eqs(inter slope) nrf(2)
family(binomial) link(logit)

Please use a Stata dataset that we can all access if you need more help.

Anders Alexandersson
[email protected]

Jessie Bishop-royse <[email protected]> compared these two models:
. gllamm infdeath black perblack_1980, i(countynumber) iter(20)
and
. xtmelogit infdeath black || countynumber: perblack_1980
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index