Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: missing data?


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: missing data?
Date   Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:55:29 -0700 (PDT)

--- On Thu, 17/6/10, Sabrina Carrossa wrote:
> On the one hand I would use the second Db (B) because it is
> the only one that allow me to use the regional information in the
> longitudinal database (while in the Db A I have the regional
> information only in the cross-sectional one).
> 
> On the other hand, I would like to be able to differentiate
> those that have not a specific good because they can't affort it from
> those that haven't a specific good for other reason.
> 
> Do you think that appending the two Db (A and B) I can
> estimate these values for the Db B such as in a missing data case?

Yes, if you need a reference: Andrew Gelman; Gary King; Chuanhai Liu
(1998) "Not Asked and Not Answered: Multiple Imputation for Multiple 
Surveys" Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(443): 
846-857.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index