Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: AW: RE: AW: Identifying unique values with codebook


From   "Airey, David C" <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: AW: RE: AW: Identifying unique values with codebook
Date   Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:17:47 -0500

.

-Inspect- is not a very useful command.

It gives a silly graph (no offense to the author), and a table of the number of negative, zero, or positive observations broken down by integer or noninteger status.

Inspect is kind of married to the command -plot-. Remember that one? It makes characters plots:

sysuse auto
plot mpg weight

Maybe Stata Corp can give -plot- a spouse and they can live happily in the land of Deprecato.


> -inspect- has its fans, but I am not among them. 
> 
> -inspect- seems to regard strings as failed numerics, and refuses to
> look inside. It would be simpler to ignore all strings. 
> 
> I wonder whether some kind of review of -inspect- is called for.
> Whatever -inspect- does that differs from -codebook- could be taken into
> -codebook-, perhaps. -inspect- could remain available under version
> control. 
> 
> Nick 
> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index