Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: A modest proposal - missing data doesn't count

From   "Martin Weiss" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: RE: A modest proposal - missing data doesn't count
Date   Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:56:08 +0200


Others have had similar thoughts:


-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of Allan Reese
Sent: Montag, 14. Juni 2010 18:52
Subject: st: A modest proposal - missing data doesn't count

Feeling aggrieved at years of typing expressions like "if x>10 & x<.",
and feeling sure there must be lots of wrong results from Stata because
users didn't notice that "x>10" includes cases with the missing value,
might I request a new code function?  

The name value() is available. While users would have to remember to use
it, it would quickly become a habit to type "if value(x)>10" etc, with
the effect that the expression would evaluate as true only when x had a
non-missing value.  A check box could be added to the menu interface as
a reminder.    


PS Not one response to my question on use of glm v blogit v glogit
(Statalist 26 May).  Does *anyone* have a view?

This email and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only.
Its unauthorised use, distribution, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted.  If you have received it in error, please destroy all copies and
notify the sender.  In messages of a non-business nature, the views and
opinions expressed are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those
of the organisation from which it is sent.  All emails may be subject to

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index