Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: [Fwd: st: AW: GLM family and link (default)]

From   "Martin Weiss" <>
To   <>
Subject   AW: [Fwd: st: AW: GLM family and link (default)]
Date   Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:17:01 +0200


"the remaining..." after the -if- qualifier, possibly. Which should not matter, since all that -probit- / -glm- ever see are 33/22 observations...


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [] Im Auftrag von Maarten buis
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Juni 2010 15:09
Betreff: Re: [Fwd: st: AW: GLM family and link (default)]

--- On Mon, 14/6/10, wrote:
> They are not 33 observations but these are the remaining...

It doesn't matter how large your dataset is, all that counts
is how many observations are used in your estimation, and
that is 33 (and only 22 in your probit model), which is a 
major problem when you want to estimate 13 parameters. Anyhow, 
the linear probability model is not the most obvious solution 
to your problem: 

First, simplify your model by using much less variables, 
I'd say an absolute maximum of 3 variables (10 obs per 

Second, use -exlogisitc- if you want to retain the variables 
that perfectly predict your outcome, which as I stated before
was the reason that your -probit- model was mis-behaving.

Hope this helps,

Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen


*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index