Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA |

Date |
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 17:28:42 -0400 |

So, "whether the data are weighted or not" was not correct! On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> wrote: > That's because there are only 69 observations with non-missing rep78. > > Steve > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> <> >> >> " The number of observations stays same at n =69, whether the data are >> weighted or not" >> >> >> >> Really? The nobs displayed by -ssc d outreg2- jump to 74 for me w/o the >> weighting: >> >> *********** >> sysuse auto, clear >> reg price weight length /*[iw=rep78] */ >> outreg2 using myfile, replace sum >> *********** >> >> >> HTH >> Martin >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Samuels >> Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 23:12 >> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> Subject: Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA >> >> Ali is wrong. -outreg2- does indeed output weighted coefficients. >> The number of observations stays same at n =69, whether the data are >> weighted or not; perhaps that is why he thinks that the results are >> not weighted. >> >> Steve >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> wrote: >>> >>> <> >>> >>> But really Michael, I am not sure whether this is the answer to the >>> question. Ali seems to be quite happy with his regression, he just wants >> it >>> displayed properly. >>> >>> So the -sum- option gives him an "unweighted" summary. But Ali, from the >>> fact that the # of obs is reduced to 69, b/c of 5 missings in "rep78", you >>> can infer that the weights are indeed respected in the output: >>> >>> *********** >>> sysuse auto, clear >>> reg price weight length [iw=rep78] >>> outreg2 using myfile, replace sum >>> *********** >>> >>> >>> HTH >>> Martin >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >>> [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Michael N. >>> Mitchell >>> Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 18:43 >>> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >>> Subject: Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA >>> >>> Dear Ali >>> >>> First off, you will want to determine the "kind" of weight that you >> have. >>> You can see >>> >>> http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?pweight >>> >>> which talks about the different kinds of weights. >>> >>> Say that you determine that your weights are -pweights- and your weight >>> variable is >>> named -wt-. You can use such weights in an OLS regression like this... >>> >>> . regress y x1 x2 x3 [pw=wt] >>> >>> I hope this helps, >>> >>> Michael N. Mitchell >>> Data Management Using Stata - >> http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html >>> A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - >> http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html >>> Stata tidbit of the week - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2010-06-08 9.07 AM, Ali Delpisheh wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I was able to produce a summary table using OUTREG2. But they are not >>>> weighted. I am running weighted regressions. How can I make them >>>> weighted? >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Ali >>>> * >>>> * For searches and help try: >>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> * >>> * For searches and help try: >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> >>> * >>> * For searches and help try: >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steven Samuels >> sjsamuels@gmail.com >> 18 Cantine's Island >> Saugerties NY 12477 >> USA >> Voice: 845-246-0774 >> Fax: 206-202-4783 >> >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> >> >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> > > > > -- > Steven Samuels > sjsamuels@gmail.com > 18 Cantine's Island > Saugerties NY 12477 > USA > Voice: 845-246-0774 > Fax: 206-202-4783 > -- Steven Samuels sjsamuels@gmail.com 18 Cantine's Island Saugerties NY 12477 USA Voice: 845-246-0774 Fax: 206-202-4783 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Weighted summary table in STATA***From:*Ali Delpisheh <ali.delpisheh4@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA***From:*"Michael N. Mitchell" <Michael.Norman.Mitchell@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA***From:*Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA***From:*Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA** - Next by Date:
**st: Re: QUestion using -fs- package** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Weighted summary table in STATA** - Next by thread:
**st: AW: -catplot- revised on SSC** - Index(es):