Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: eivreg and deming


From   "Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: eivreg and deming
Date   Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:11:00 -0700

At a seminar not long ago, an eminent statistician commented that EIV was not very useful and led to more problems (he didn't specify what they were) that it was worth.  Anyone else have similar experience?

Tony

Peter A. Lachenbruch
Department of Public Health
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97330
Phone: 541-737-3832
FAX: 541-737-4001

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Risto.Herrala@bof.fi
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:12 AM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: eivreg and deming

Hi
I's need to do errors in variables regression, where the errors are heteroscedastic. A Stata user has programmed a 'deming' ado -file for this purpose. Does anyone have experience of its use?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index