Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: st: statistical significance of cut points in ordered logit


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   AW: st: statistical significance of cut points in ordered logit
Date   Mon, 17 May 2010 13:50:01 +0200

<> 

" I got the material http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc63993/l91.pdf provided
by Maarten, which is helpful."



Just to be sure, the material you are referring to is provided by Richard
Williams, Maarten probably pointed you to it.

HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Grace Jessie
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Mai 2010 13:47
An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Betreff: Re: st: statistical significance of cut points in ordered logit


Statalists,
I got the material http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc63993/l91.pdf provided by
Maarten, which is helpful. Thank you!
After typing the following in the Stata, I found some obersavtions were
suprising to me(see table A). In table A, For example,xb[1] is obviously
bigger than the coefficient of cut1,so the value for Y should equal 2.
However, from the values for pr1 pr2 pr3, the value for pr1 is the biggest,
which means the most likely outcome for Y is 1. Why not consistent?  The
doubt with other observations in table A is the same. 
Additionally, what does the statistical significance of cut points in
ordered logit mean, which has not been answered in the posting before? I
found there are no z or P>|z| for cut points, though I could get it.
 
use http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/statafiles/shuttle2.dta, clear
ologit distress date temp, nolog
Ordered logistic regression                       Number of obs   =
23
                                                  LR chi2(2)      =
12.32
                                                  Prob> chi2     =
0.0021
Log likelihood =  -18.79706                       Pseudo R2       =
0.2468
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
    distress |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z|     [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------
--
        date |    .003286   .0012662     2.60   0.009     .0008043
.0057677
        temp |  -.1733752   .0834473    -2.08   0.038     -.336929
-.0098215
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------
--
       /cut1 |   16.42813   9.554813                      -2.29896
35.15522
       /cut2 |   18.12227   9.722293                     -.9330729
37.17761
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
predict xb,xb
predict pr1 pr2 pr3
 
table A
  +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
  | distress   date   temp         xb        pr1        pr2        pr3 |
  |--------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |     None   8732     70   16.55703   .4678189    .359285   .1728961 |
  |   1 or 2   9341     81   16.65107   .4444934   .3687458   .1867608 |
  |   3 plus   9434     75   17.99692   .1723883   .3589076    .468704 |
  |   1 or 2   9461     76   17.91227   .1848028   .3675054   .4476918 |
  +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Hope for any help!

Regards,
Grace
 
  		 	   		  
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index