Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: question on gllamm for discrete latent variable with one factor structure


From   Hey Sky <heyskywalker@yahoo.com>
To   statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: question on gllamm for discrete latent variable with one factor structure
Date   Mon, 10 May 2010 14:10:34 -0700 (PDT)

Dear Kolenikov

thanks for your answer and maybe for future answer too :) 

I think I have tried without the cons in the eq option with more than one latent variables .  
ie. 

eq mu1: edu
eq mu2: wrknt
eq mu3: wrkwt
eq mu4: home

gllamm dep indep,  i(id) base(4) link(mlogit) family(binom) nip(2) ip(f) nrf(3)  ///
 eq(mu1 mu2 mu3) dots trace

but it does not converge either. I will go back and check my memory is right or not. 

I will try the nocons option and see what the result will be. and thanks for remind me
the typo in my last post. I do have the name of the eq option in my code.

PS. what is the option peqs, geqs for? I think I do not really understand the part on manual

Nan
from Montreal



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index