Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Christopher Baum <baum@bc.edu> |

To |
W Zang <W.L.Zang@Bradford.ac.uk> |

Subject |
Re: st: re: xtivreg |

Date |
Wed, 5 May 2010 10:07:52 -0400 |

<> If the XT-IV model is properly specified, and fixed effects are necessary to ensure consistency, the pooled IV results are inconsistent, and any test based upon them is invalid. You should be able to use the same syntax with endog(y2) on the ivreg2 command, but I am not surprised that the results differ. In the presence of unobserved heterogeneity, the pooled IV will be junk. Kit Kit Baum | Boston College Economics and DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html On May 5, 2010, at 9:37 AM, W Zang wrote: > Dear Kit > > Thank you very much for your previous reply. I have another question and wonder if you could help me please. Before estimating the two simultaneous equations, I did the endogeneity test of y2. > xtivreg2 y1 (y2 = x4 x5) x1 x2 x3, fe endog (y2) > > I also performed Durbin-Wu-Hausman test. > ivreg2 y1 (y2 = x4 x5) x1 x2 x3 > ivendog (y2) > > I got two different results. y2 is proved to be exogeneous in the first case and y2 is endogenous in the second case. Did I do something wrong? Which test should I follow? > > Best Wishes, > > Linda > >> >> Quoting Kit Baum <baum@bc.edu>: >> >>> <> >>> Linda said >>> >>> I am trying to use xtivreg to estimate two-stage least squares >>> simultaneous equations. I have two endogenous variables Y1 and Y2. Y1 >>> and Y2 are affected by different exogenous variables. Y1 is affected >>> by X1, X2, X3 and Y2 is affected by X1, X4, X5. >>> >>> Y1 = a0 + a1*Y2 + a2*X1 + a3*X2 + a4*X3 >>> Y2 = b0 + b1*Y1 + b2*X1 + b3*X4 + b4*X5 >>> >>> >>> xtivreg y1 (y2 = x4 x5) x1 x2 x3, fe >>> xtivreg y2 (y1 = x2 x3) x1 x4 x5, fe >>> >>> The syntax is the same as it would be for a non-panel IV estimator. Just list the variables excluded from each equation within the parenthesized expression. >>> >>> Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html >>> An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html >>> An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html >>> >>> >>> * >>> * For searches and help try: >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >> >> >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: re: xtivreg***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: re: xtivreg***From:*Kit Baum <baum@bc.edu>

**Re: st: re: xtivreg***From:*W Zang <W.L.Zang@Bradford.ac.uk>

**Re: st: re: xtivreg***From:*W Zang <W.L.Zang@Bradford.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: re: xtivreg** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: Import Excel with xmluse** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: re: xtivreg** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: re: xtivreg** - Index(es):