Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Re: GMM: 2SLS with over-identification

From   Kit Baum <>
Subject   st: Re: GMM: 2SLS with over-identification
Date   Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:40:49 -0400

On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:33 AM, Ed wrote:

> In Stata 11 -gmm-, is it possible to estimate an over-identified 2SLS
> model in which some observations have fewer than the full number of
> instruments?  This is possible when estimating a dynamic panel model
> (with either -gmm- or -xtabond-).  The online Stata manual says:
> "-gmm- automatically excludes observations for which there are no valid
> observations for the panel-style instruments. However, it keeps in the
> estimation sample those observations for which fewer than the maximum
> number of instruments you requested are available. For example, if you
> specify the lags(2/4) suboption, you have requested three instruments,
> but -gmm- will keep observations even if only one or two instruments are
> available."
> I would like to be able to do something similar, but for 2SLS
> (over-identified).  Is that possible?

Presumably you can 'roll your own' version of the trick used in the Arellano-Bond estimator: in the constructed instruments, nonexistent values (e.g., higher lags than are available at that point in time) are set to zero. So instead of using a lags() option to create the instruments, create them explicitly and fill their missing values with zeros. 

Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |
                              An Introduction to Stata Programming  |
   An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index