Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: remaining missings after multiple imputation


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: remaining missings after multiple imputation
Date   Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:04:44 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Mon, 19/4/10, Anne Jurczok wrote:
> I decided against using ice, since I have different types
> of missings in my dataset (hard and soft missings) and I
> couldn't find any literature about different types of
> missings handled by ice.

It is implicit in the sense that -ice- allows you to specify
an -if- statement. So, you could type something like:

gen byte soft = lnvermgen < .a
ice <varlist> if soft, <other options>

> Not all cases of my dataset are considered for the
> imputation.

Do these observations contain only missing values on
the variables you use for the imputation?

-- Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index