Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Stata implementation of difference-in-differences with binary outcomes


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Stata implementation of difference-in-differences with binary outcomes
Date   Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:57:03 -0700 (PDT)

--- On Fri, 16/4/10, C Engelbrecht wrote:
> But what if the outcome variable is binary? How should I
> model the difference of two latent variables, as is the
> case in Probit / Logit? The usual DID is based on
> differencing Y across these groups, but what should we
> do now that we only have a latent Y*?

Difference in difference is all about getting at a causal
effect, which is usually difined as a difference in 
averages. This also exists and is meaningful when the 
dependent variable is binary, that is the risk difference.
You can calculate it using a linear probability model,
which is just a fancy name of using -regress- on a binary
variable (possibly with the -vce(robust)- option.

There is often some uneasyness in specifying "the effect" 
as linear in the probability metric, as that can 
eventually lead to predictions outside the range [0, 1]. 
However, if you define the effect interms of odds ratios 
or probit coefficients, you won't get the causal effects 
either, see for example: Mood 2010, Allison 1999, or 
Neuhaus and Jewell 1993.

So my guess would be that the linear probability model
is in this case the lesser of two evils.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

Allison, Paul D. 1999. "Comparing Logit and Probit 
Coefficients Across Groups." Sociological Methods & 
Research 28:186–208.

Mood, Carina. 2010. "Logistic regression: Why we cannot 
do what we think we can do, and what we can do about 
it." European Sociological Review 26:67–82.

Neuhaus, John M. and Nicholas P. Jewell. 1993. "A 
Geometric Approach to Assess Bias Due to Omited 
Covariates in Generalized Linear Models." Biometrika 
80:807–815.

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------




      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index