Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: AKAIKE formula

From   Maarten buis <>
Subject   Re: st: AKAIKE formula
Date   Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:29:51 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Tue, 13/4/10, Paulo Regis wrote:
> Lets say it is an F-test, where one of the "q" 
> restrictions is the coefficient of the lag of the dependent
> variable. In my example, I showed the case where q=1. 
> H0: c = 0 .
> More general for an F-statistic, since you have the lag of
> the dependent variable, there is endogeneity (you can use
> lags of the indep variables as instruments). Therefore, you
> can think of a Wald test where:
> a) you use OLS for the restricted model.
> b) you should use IV for the unrestricted model.
> Alternatively, I could check which of the two models
> minimize akaike.
> How inappropriate is that?

I am guessing you mean the following:

- you have model where you believe that you need to use an
IV estimator because you added a laged dependent variable
as a predictor.

- You have a second model that did not include the laged
dependent variable, so you concluded that you did not
have to use an IV estimator

Both models contain a variable x

You are interested in the hypothesis that the effect of x
is equal in both models.

Sounds a bit similar to a setup for a Hausman test, so maybe 
you can look into that literature to see if that can give
you some inspiration on how to takle your problem.

Maybe somebody else on the list has a bright idea?

-- Maarten

Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen


*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index