Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: RE: Means for Metan |

Date |
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:14:59 +0100 |

That's a bit clearer. Thanks. On the understanding that the first, second, ... observation contain information for 0, 1, ... mentions gen wt = _n - 1 su j? [fw=wt] Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Aggie Chidlow Dear Nick (and others), Sincerely Appologies. It is not my intention for you to do any guess work... I am working on a meta-analysis the data I have looks like this: All Data Collection | Name of the journal the article appeared Procedures together | J1 J2 J3 J4 | Total Not Mention | 68 41 32 25 | 166 One Step mention | 17 14 17 12 | 60 Two Steps mention | 8 9 8 5 | 30 Three Steps mention | 4 5 2 6 | 17 Four Steps mention | 1 2 1 1 | 5 Five Steps mention | 1 0 0 0 | 1 ----------------------+--------------------------------------------+---------- Total | 99 71 60 49 | 279 Today, it was suggested to me that I could calculate the mean number of mentions, within each of 4 journals and then perform metan to calculate a weighted average mean across the 4 journals. In order to do this I have to transpose the data from the table above to this: Data Collection Procedures j1 j2 j3 j4 total > Not Mentioned 68 41 32 25 166 > One Step Mentioned 17 14 17 12 60 > Two Steps Mentioned 8 9 8 5 30 > Three Steps Mentioned 4 5 2 6 17 > Four Steps Mentioned 1 2 1 1 5 > Five Steps Mentioned 1 0 0 0 1 I am stuck at this point, because I am struggling to figure out how to calculate the mean number of mentions with their standard errors for this data. Many thanks in advance, Aggie On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > Please show us the data you want to work on. > Please don't ask us to imagine, guess or work out what they looks like. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > Aggie Chidlow > > > I have the following data: > > Steps j1 j2 j3 j4 total > Not Mentioned 68 41 32 25 166 > One Step Mentioned 17 14 17 12 60 > Two Steps Mentioned 8 9 8 5 30 > Three Steps Mentioned 4 5 2 6 17 > Four Steps Mentioned 1 2 1 1 5 > Five Steps Mentioned 1 0 0 0 1 > > I would very much appreciated if somebody could help me with the > syntax to calculate the > mean number of mentions with their standard error after . keep j1 j2 > j3 j4 total and > . xpose,clear are used. > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: Means for Metan***From:*Aggie Chidlow <mojamalarybka@googlemail.com>

**References**:**st: Means for Metan***From:*Aggie Chidlow <mojamalarybka@googlemail.com>

**st: RE: Means for Metan***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: Means for Metan***From:*Aggie Chidlow <mojamalarybka@googlemail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: Changing variable name to variable label** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: Means for Metan** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Means for Metan** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Means for Metan** - Index(es):