Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: HLM vs. Stata for multilevel modeling
From
"Russel Wildeman" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: HLM vs. Stata for multilevel modeling
Date
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:52:13 +0200
Rosie,
You can go to the Centre for Multilevel Modelling at the University of
Bristol in the UK (just Google it). Comparisons were done across a range of
programmes using multilevel models.
HTH,
Russell
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rosie Chen
Sent: 12 April 2010 03:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: HLM vs. Stata for multilevel modeling
Dear all,
Do you know if any reference has compared the use of HLMand Stata for
multilevel modeling? I have been using HLM software for
multilevel analysis, but it seems to me that Stata has more functions than
HLM (e.g., calculating predicted probability). I wonder what are
the advantages and disadvantages of using HLM compared with Stata in
multilevel modeling?
In addition, one of my studies will utilize discrete-time multilevel
analysis method (a combination of survival analysis and multilevel
modeling), so how do these two software compare in terms of accommodating
this analytic method? I will consider earning to use Stata for such an
analysis if Stata is good for this purpose.
Any thoughts and suggestions are appreciated. Thank you very much!!
Rosie
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/