Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: dealing with endogeneity in mlogit


From   Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: dealing with endogeneity in mlogit
Date   Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:09:34 -0400

godwin osoro <gotieno7@gmail.com> :
See e.g. ref given in
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-06/msg00610.html

One option: define a binary outcome from your multinomial outcome and
use an IV method for binary outcomes.  You can even do this once for
each possible outcome, relative to all other outcomes, and it is
possible to jointly estimate these models.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:58 PM, godwin osoro <gotieno7@gmail.com> wrote:
> dear all. how can i deal with endogeneity when running a multinomial
> logit regression?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index