Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
AW: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10? |

Date |
Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:58:18 +0200 |

<> " If anyone can find me, the book and a pen in the same place, I'll happily sign it too." Sounds like you should disclose your planned UGM attendance this year :-) HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Nick Cox Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 11:54 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10? The article in question is reproduced in Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seventy-six Stata Tips, 2nd Edition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H. J. Newton and N. J. Cox, Editor http://www.stata.com/bookstore/tips2.html It's USD 29 to Michael. If anyone can find me, the book and a pen in the same place, I'll happily sign it too. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Michael I. Lichter I don't have access to Nick's article, unfortunately, so I don't know if he indicates where this is documented. Martin Weiss wrote: See also Nick`s http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-11/msg00769.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Michael I. Lichter" <mlichter@buffalo.edu>

**st: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**st: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Michael I. Lichter" <mlichter@buffalo.edu>

**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Merging two datasets multiple times** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?** - Index(es):