Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"G. Dai" <dgecon@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: R: How much of variation in dep var is explained by various sets of variables? |

Date |
Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:00:45 -0700 |

no you can't. one deep problem with any such kind of decomposition is the order dependence, that is the percentage of variation depends on the order of adding variables. On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Carlo Lazzaro <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it> wrote: > Dear Adrian, > As far as I know, in case of linearity (as OLS should imply) this issue can > be addressed via ANCOVA (please, see Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K. > Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxpord University > press, 2006: 130-132). > > Kind Regards, > Carlo > > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di kokootchke > Inviato: domenica 4 aprile 2010 2.35 > A: statalist > Oggetto: st: How much of variation in dep var is explained by various sets > of variables? > > Dear all, > > I would like to know if it's possible to determine how much of the variation > in the dependent variable is explained by different sets of variables. For > instance, suppose I have: > > (1) y = a*x1 + b*x2 + c*x3 + d*z1 + d*z2 + d*z3 + d*z4 > (2) y = e*x1 + f*x2 + g*x3 > (3) y = h*z1 + i*z2 + j*z3 + k*z4 > > If I run these regressions by OLS, I obtain, say, R-sq = 0.30, 0.20, 0.15, > respectively. Is it possible to determine what percentage of the variation > in y in (1) is explained by the x's and what percentage is explained by the > z's? > > I read some of the threads on this issue and I found some notes on partial > correlation and the -pcorr- command. I read Richard Williams's notes and it > seems like you can determine the proportion of the variation in y focusing > on one variable at a time... but I don't know if it's possible to do it by > sets of variables. > > Thank you very much for your help. > > Best, > Adrian > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:W > L:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3 > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: R: How much of variation in dep var is explained by various sets of variables?***From:*"Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>

**References**:**st: How much of variation in dep var is explained by various sets of variables?***From:*kokootchke <kokootchke@hotmail.com>

**st: R: How much of variation in dep var is explained by various sets of variables?***From:*"Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it>

- Prev by Date:
**st: st_numscalar** - Next by Date:
**st: Multinomial logistic regression with cross-classified data structure** - Previous by thread:
**st: R: How much of variation in dep var is explained by various sets of variables?** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: R: How much of variation in dep var is explained by various sets of variables?** - Index(es):