Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Phil Schumm <pschumm@uchicago.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Number of Obs with svy , suppop() |

Date |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:42:34 -0500 |

On Mar 19, 2010, at 3:17 AM, Michael Norman Mitchell wrote:

Thank you for your reply... I am still struggling to solidlyunderstand this. Perhaps I have a more fundamental question. What isthe formula for the "Number of obs" in the context of the -svy-commands. It sounds like, in the absence of the -subpop()- option,it is the number of observations with non-missing values on thetabulated variable. And, in the presence of the -subpop()- option itis the total number of observations minus the number of observationsthat meet the -subpop()- option and are missing on the tabulatedvariable. Am I on the right track here?

svy, subpop(if sex==1 & !mi(race)):

-- Phil

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Number of Obs with svy , suppop()***From:*Michael Mitchell <Michael.Norman.Mitchell@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Number of Obs with svy , suppop()***From:*Phil Schumm <pschumm@uchicago.edu>

**Re: st: Number of Obs with svy , suppop()***From:*Michael Norman Mitchell <Michael.Norman.Mitchell@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: re: Newey, F** - Next by Date:
**st: simultaneous tobit** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Number of Obs with svy , suppop()** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Number of Obs with svy , suppop()** - Index(es):