Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: correcting skewness of an indep variables


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   stata list <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: correcting skewness of an indep variables
Date   Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:24:31 -0700 (PDT)

--- On Mon, 15/3/10, Lachenbruch, Peter wrote:
> If the observations are identifiable a priori (e.g., 
> hospitalization cost if not hospitalized) you can use a 
> two-part model.  See Lachenbruch,  P. A., (2001) 
> "Comparison of competitors to the two part model" 
> Statistics in Medicine 20(8) 1215-1234 Lachenbruch, P. A.
> (2002) "Analysis of Data with Excess Zeros" Statistical
> Methods in Medical Research 11(4) 297-302
> The second reference is an introduction to a volume of SMMR
> on this problem.

Don't these references deal more with the case where such
variables are the depenent/explained/y variable, rather than
the case where such variables are the independent/explanatory/x
variable? 

If I understood the original question correctly, than that 
question concerned the latter case, and the solution I proposed 
(add the original variable + a dummy indicating which 
observation had a spike value and which not) is certainly only
appropriate for that latter case.

-- Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index