Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis
Date   Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:31:13 -0000

The best way to apologise is to give it.... Still tua culpa, if not tua
maxima culpa. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Ricardo Ovaldia

Thank you Nick.
I am sorry for not providing the full reference. mea culpa.

-- On Mon, 3/15/10, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote:

> From: Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
> Subject: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 11:22 AM
> . findit Kruskal 
> 
> turns up what there is. -findit- is a variant on -search-,
> recommended
> to you in the last thread you started. 
> 
> Minimal name (year) references are deprecated on this list.
> But the
> procedure recommended in that book is almost certainly
> highly
> programmable. 

Ricardo Ovaldia
 
> Is there a Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis in Stata?
> Something like the one proposed by Sokal and Rohlf (1995).

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index