Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis

From   "Nick Cox" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis
Date   Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:31:13 -0000

The best way to apologise is to give it.... Still tua culpa, if not tua
maxima culpa. 


Ricardo Ovaldia

Thank you Nick.
I am sorry for not providing the full reference. mea culpa.

-- On Mon, 3/15/10, Nick Cox <> wrote:

> From: Nick Cox <>
> Subject: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis
> To:
> Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 11:22 AM
> . findit Kruskal 
> turns up what there is. -findit- is a variant on -search-,
> recommended
> to you in the last thread you started. 
> Minimal name (year) references are deprecated on this list.
> But the
> procedure recommended in that book is almost certainly
> highly
> programmable. 

Ricardo Ovaldia
> Is there a Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis in Stata?
> Something like the one proposed by Sokal and Rohlf (1995).

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index