Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Marginal effects with natural log of independent variable


From   Misha Spisok <misha.spisok@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Marginal effects with natural log of independent variable
Date   Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:12:00 -0800

Yeah, you're right; x_ij does appear in p_ij.  I had in mind that p_ij
was sitting there, already calculated.

Maybe a better way to express my concern is that I'm interested in the
change in p_ij due to a change in x_ij, not due to a change in
ln(x_ij).

Thanks.

Misha

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote:
> Misha Spisok <misha.spisok@gmail.com> :
>
> p_ij is a function of x_ij, so it does appear, right?
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Misha Spisok <misha.spisok@gmail.com> wrote:
>> One benefit I see is that the variable, x_ij, doesn't appear in this
>> expression.
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index