Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: strata with single sampling units

Subject   Re: st: strata with single sampling units
Date   Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:04:25 -0500

" Would I be safe in assuming that one would use weight and PSU, and ignore
strata in this case? "

No. Do not ignore the stratum specification.  By placing certainty
units in their unique strata you ensure that they contribute nothing
to the between-PSU component of variance.  If the purpose of your
study is to describe the population, then the first stage fpc for the
certainty units should be 1.

Steve Samuels
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477

> When I went back to the documentation it is stated that the study
> used a multistage stratified design in which primary sampling units
> (PSUs) were stratified according to certain sociodemographic criteria. The
> sampling
> frame for housing units is the Census 2000/2001 Supplementary Survey
> (C2SS) and that
> for group quarters is the Census 2000 Group Quarters Inventory. The C2SS
> sample of
> 655 PSUs was selected at the first stage, including 401 self-representing
> (SR) and 254
> non-self-representing (NSR) PSUs. All SR PSUs were selected with
> certainty. For the
> NSR sample, two PSUs were selected per stratum, with probability
> proportional to the
> size of the estimated 1996 population of the stratum.  NOTE: Sample was
> included from each of the 655 PSUs.
> However, to prevent potential respondent disclosure, some PSUs were
> collapsed so that the final
> data file shows 435 PSUs, 305 being SR and 130 being NSR.
> So there are 305 strata with one PSU.  Final sample is 43,093.
> Would I be safe in assuming that one would use weight and PSU, and ignore
> strata in this case?  No other design variables are provided.  Doing
> things this way seems to replicate SEs in the published tables  -- at
> least the few I tried to replicate.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index