Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Isabelle Deltour" <deltour@cancer.dk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: graph use and directory paths |

Date |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:13:49 +0100 |

Thanks, this works. Isabelle -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Ploutz-Snyder, Robert (JSC-SK)[USRA] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:05 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: graph use and directory paths Could this be due to the missing letter designation for your fileserver? Possible to use direct letter that Windows assigns to that server? -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Isabelle Deltour Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:00 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: graph use and directory paths Dear Stata-listers, I have noted that the graph use command behaves in a way I cannot understand: if I double click on the file, then the file is reported not found. If, however, I change directory first, and then graph use the file, it works. (I am using Stata 9 for Windows if that is relevant). Example below: . graph use \\filserv.cancer.dk\EPI\EPI-Brugere\deltour\MiscSupport\GraphR\GraphPFOS .gph file \filserv.cancer.dk\EPI\EPI-Brugere\deltour\MiscSupport\GraphR\GraphPFOS. gph not found r(601); . cd \\filserv.cancer.dk\EPI\EPI-Brugere\deltour\MiscSupport\GraphR\ \\filserv.cancer.dk\EPI\EPI-Brugere\deltour\MiscSupport\GraphR . graph use GraphPFOS.gph (graph shows up). Have others noticed this? I cannot figure out why this is so: is there an explanation for this? (sometimes the path of the graph is included in "", with no apparent improvement). Is this a known behavior that has been amended in more recent releases? Thanks for your ideas. Isabelle Isabelle Deltour Statistician * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: RE: graph use and directory paths***From:*"Ploutz-Snyder, Robert (JSC-SK)[USRA]" <robert.ploutz-snyder-1@nasa.gov>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: graph use and directory paths** - Next by Date:
**st: Missing F-statistic using areg, absorb( ) cluster( )** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: graph use and directory paths** - Next by thread:
**st: Missing F-statistic using areg, absorb( ) cluster( )** - Index(es):