Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: GAM in survey commands


From   Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: GAM in survey commands
Date   Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:28:02 -0600

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Priscilla Martinez <
priscilla.martinez@medisin.uio.no> wrote:

> I'm working on a complex survey sample and want to confirm that running a
> generalized additive model is not feasible with survey commands? I've done
> numerous searches and it seems so, but I want to make sure I'm not missing
> something.
>

Depends on how you approach it. If you are using a 10-year old -gam- command
by Patrick Royston, then the answer is no. If you produce your own basis
functions and plug them into -regress- or -glm-, then of course that works
fine with -svy- prefix.

-- 
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index