Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
AW: st: RE: AW: Re: |

Date |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:07:11 +0100 |

<> " The reason why I have so many different datasets is that I read somewhere that Stata cannot filter observations properly, i.e. without deleting the remaining dataset." Not so, as you correctly guessed. Use the -if- qualifier! " With regard to the centile(5 50 95) command, it has only been a bit of laziness that I didn´t try to omit the 5 and 50-centiles - as soon as it worked, I was happy :-)" Omit 5 and 50, and then use - post internal (r(lb_1)) (r(c_1)) (r(ub_1))- for the -postfile- HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von aschaich@smail.uni-koeln.de Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2010 01:07 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: RE: st: RE: AW: Re: As I told in my first post, I´m an absolute Stata rookie. The reason why I have so many different datasets is that I read somewhere that Stata cannot filter observations properly, i.e. without deleting the remaining dataset. That´s probably nonsense... So in order to deduce conditional statements, I split the original (huge) dataset into numerous sub-datasets. With regard to the centile(5 50 95) command, it has only been a bit of laziness that I didn´t try to omit the 5 and 50-centiles - as soon as it worked, I was happy :-) And by the way: Thanks a lot for the hint with the loop - I´m gonna try it right away! Here too, someone told me that looping within a filename wasn´t possible... Best, Andi Zitat von Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>: > > <> > > It is good to hear you are satisfied with the solution, but I am not quite > sure what your data structure looks like. You request three centiles from > Stata with your call -centile PF_norm, centile(5 50 95)-, but you store only > one of them, the 95% one, via -postfile-. This is your prerogative, but it > seems inefficient to me. What are the 5% and 50% quantile requests good for > in your call? > > > You said in an earlier post that you have to repeat this process frequently, > so you may want to know that you can employ a loop to call your datasets: > > > ******* > forv i=1/2{ > use "C:\...\ALL_complete_1.`i'.dta" > //... your other commands > } > ******* > > The endpoint for the index here is 2, you can enter the appropriate number > yourself. > > Does each of those datasets really only contain one interesting variable? > Why are they dispersed across many datasets (just being curious)? > > > HTH > Martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of > aschaich@smail.uni-koeln.de > Sent: Dienstag, 23. Februar 2010 19:03 > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: st: RE: AW: Re: > > Hey guys, > > > sorry for having bothered you again, I found the solution in the meantime! > In case someone is interested, here´s the syntax: > > > log using test, replace > use "C:\...\ALL_complete_1.1.dta" > centile PF_norm, centile(5 50 95) > postfile internal lower_ci95 centile_95 upper_ci95 using "filename", replace > post internal (r(lb_3)) (r(c_3)) (r(ub_3)) > clear > use "C:\...\ALL_complete_1.2.dta" > centile PF_norm, centile(5 50 95) > post internal (r(lb_3)) (r(c_3)) (r(ub_3)) > postclose internal > clear > log close > > > Still thanks for the help you gave me so far! > Andreas > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: AW: st: RE: AW: Re:***From:*aschaich@smail.uni-koeln.de

**References**:**[no subject]***From:*aschaich@smail.uni-koeln.de

**st: Re:***From:*"Karen Wright" <Karen.Wright@icr.ac.uk>

**st: AW: Re:***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**st: RE: AW: Re:***From:*"Abrams, Judith" <abramsj@karmanos.org>

**Re: st: RE: AW: Re:***From:*aschaich@smail.uni-koeln.de

**Re: st: RE: AW: Re:***From:*aschaich@smail.uni-koeln.de

**RE: st: RE: AW: Re:***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**RE: st: RE: AW: Re:***From:*aschaich@smail.uni-koeln.de

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: regression r(103): too many variables** - Next by Date:
**AW: st: RE: regression r(103): too many variables** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: RE: AW: Re:** - Next by thread:
**Re: AW: st: RE: AW: Re:** - Index(es):