Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: New rules


From   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   RE: st: RE: New rules
Date   Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:36:46 -0500

I guess I missed most of the fireworks which is just as well.  I took a
quick look at the Statalist archives & saw that Jann has been contributing
from at least as far back as 2004 & Wada back to 2005 or earlier. 
Presumably there was a period when one, probably both, were strong
contributors to Statalist.  I don't see how a one-day screening at
subscription time can possibly weed out future trouble-makers.  Tony's
suggestion strikes me as more efficient & efficacious.

Eric
 

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Lachenbruch, Peter [email protected]
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:05:12 -0800
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: RE: New rules

I'm not sure the screening will work - someone can log in and later become
a pain in the neck.  The solution is to give them one or  two  warnings
about inappropriate mail and then BOOM!

Tony
-------------------
New subscribers will have to go through a screening process that will add
time, hopefully less than a day, before they can subscribe. The screening
process is 
designed to keep some, hopefully very few, people out...
Keep on listing!

m.p.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web LIVE ? Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index