Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: New rules


From   Neil Shephard <nshephard@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: New rules
Date   Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:01:50 +0000

I'd imagine screening will also help prevent spam "bots" from
registering on the list.

Not that there's much spam makes it to the list anyway, the listserver
seems quite good at weeding them out (bar the occasional 'Out of
Office').

MedStats ( http://groups.google.com/group/MedStats )has a screening
process whereby you have to answer a question (or two, can't
remember).

Personally I don't see that its really an impediment to subscribers.

Neil

-- 
"... no scientific worker has a fixed level of significance at which
from year to year, and in all circumstances, he rejects hypotheses; he
rather gives his mind to each particular case in the light of his
evidence and his ideas." - Sir Ronald A. Fisher (1956)

Email - nshephard@gmail.com
Website - http://slack.ser.man.ac.uk/
Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackline/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index