[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
<jreif@uchicago.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: Re: xtdpd vs. xtabond2 discrepancy |

Date |
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:17:20 -0600 (CST) |

You need to add an h(2) option to -xtabond2-. The following will produce the same point estimates: webuse abdata, clear xtabond2 n L.n, gmm(n, laglimits(2 .)) small h(2) xtdpd n L.n, dgmm(n, lagrange(2 .)) lgmm(n, lag(1)) The standard errors are still different though. Does anybody know why? Julian ---- Original message ---- >From John Bates <lirac271@yahoo.com> >To Stata <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> >Subject st: xtdpd vs. xtabond2 discrepancy >Date Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:22:44 -0800 (PST) > > Hi, > > I get different answers when using -xtdpd- vs. -xtabond2- for System GMM. First, I show that this is not a problem for difference GMM: > > webuse abdata, clear > * The three commands below all produce identical estimates for difference GMM > xtabond n, lags(1) noconst > xtabond2 n L.n, gmm(n, laglimits(2 .)) nolevel small > xtdpd n L.n, dgmm(n, lagrange(2 .)) noconstant > > > But, when I do system GMM I get different answers: > > xtabond2 n L.n, gmm(n, laglimits(2 .)) small > xtdpd n L.n, dgmm(n, lagrange(2 .)) lgmm(n, lag(1)) > > (I get different answers regardless of whether or not I specify the noconstant option.) Note that in the system GMM example, both commands report they are using 36 instruments and, in particular, report that they are using the exact same instruments for both the levels and difference equations. In this simple example the answers only differ at the second decimal point, but I've run other (more complicated) variations that have much larger differences (>20%). For example: > > xtabond2 n L.n w ys k, gmm(n, laglimits(2 .)) iv(w ys k) small > xtdpd n L.n w ys k, dgmm(n, lagrange(2 .)) lgmm(n, lag(1)) iv(w ys k) > > > What accounts for these differences? I don't know which command's output to use. I am running the latest update of Stata 11 and have the latest version of -xtabond2- (2.8.2). > > Thanks, > John * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: RE: xtdpd vs. xtabond2 discrepancy***From:*"David Roodman (droodman@cgdev.org)" <DRoodman@CGDEV.ORG>

- Prev by Date:
**st: AW: xtgls, xtpcse or xtreg when the dataset is very small and N > T** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Missing values in panel data** - Previous by thread:
**st: xtgls, xtpcse or xtreg when the dataset is very small and N > T** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: xtdpd vs. xtabond2 discrepancy** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |