Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: st: Re: program to generate variable list as input for other program


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   AW: st: Re: program to generate variable list as input for other program
Date   Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:37:46 +0100

<> 


No, I guess the second part of the statement applies: " ...or are for
various reasons now
> considered of secondary importance."

HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Klaus Pforr
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 00:26
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: st: Re: program to generate variable list as input for other
program

##

does that mean that -ds- is in that definition superseded by a more 
recent, better command and if that is the case, what is it?

Klaus

Nick Cox schrieb:
> As others have pointed out, this text does not quite apply to -ds-. I
> suspect that StataCorp need to fix this text: that is the easiest
> solution! Something like 
> 
> Previously documented commands are commands of Stata from a previous
> release that are no longer documented because they have been superseded
> by more recent, better commands or are for various reasons now
> considered of secondary importance. 
> 
> Nick 
> [email protected] 
> 
> Airey, David C
> 
>> The program -sender- can be replaced by the line -ds, has(type
> numeric)-,
>> see: -help ds-.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> Maarten
> 
> In the help file it says -ds- has been dropped as official Stata as of
> version 9, although it still works and has a man page that will not be
> updated. It is officially "undocumented". When I read about that kind of
> Stata command, I see:
> 
> "Previously documented commands are commands of Stata from a previous
> release that are no longer documented because they have been superseded
> by more recent, better commands.  The commands continue to work,
> although
> sometimes only under version control.  The help files for the commands
> listed below are still available online to assist in understanding old
> do-files and ado-files."
> 
> But in the documentation for -ds- I am not pointed to the replacement
> command, but a list of commands that might cover the lost function. What
> is the improved replacement for -ds, has(type numeric)-?
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

-- 
__________________________________

Klaus Pforr
MZES AB - A
Universität Mannheim
D - 68131 Mannheim
Tel:  +49-621-181 2801
fax:  +49-621-181 2803
URL:  http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de

Besucheranschrift: A5, Raum A312
__________________________________



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index