[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically

From	"Verkuilen, Jay" <[email protected]>
To	"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject	RE: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
Date	Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:18:10 -0500

David Kantor wrote:

>Yes, the phenomenon is called Fechner's Law or the Fechner-Weber Law.

Indeed it is, and it's been a perplexing thing for nearly two centuries now. (He says, having been very interested in such things in the past, and maybe in the future, but not right now.) 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fechner%27s_law

Jay

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

References:
- st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
  - From: "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
- Re: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
  - From: Ronan Conroy <[email protected]>
- RE: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
  - From: "Lachenbruch, Peter" <[email protected]>
- RE: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
  - From: David Kantor <[email protected]>
- RE: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
  - From: "Verkuilen, Jay" <[email protected]>
- RE: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
  - From: David Kantor <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: st: Some problems with clogit convergence when adding year dummies
Next by Date: Re: st: Unequal probability without replacment in a multistage sample
Previous by thread: RE: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
Next by thread: Re: st: Think graphically, think logarithmically
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread