Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Mata bug in st_sview()?


From   Sergiy Radyakin <serjradyakin@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Mata bug in st_sview()?
Date   Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:55:57 -0500

Dear Jeff,
thank you for your attention to this case.
Best wishes,
    Sergiy Radyakin



On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Jeff Pitblado, StataCorp LP
<jpitblado@stata.com> wrote:
> Sergiy Radyakin <serjradyakin@gmail.com> noticed that, in Stata 11,
> -st_view(V,i,j[,selectvar])- allows a varlist in the string elements of the
> 'j' argument but -st_sview()- does not.
>
> That -st_sview()- and -st_sdata()- do not allow varlists in the string
> elements of 'j' was an oversite.  We will fix this in a future exectuable
> update.
>
> This varlist feature was added to -st_view()- for Stata 11, prior to that
> -st_view()- required that the 'j' argument contain exactly one variable name
> in each element, and -st_view()- did not support time-series operators.
>
> In Stata 11, -st_view()- supports time-series operators and the new factor
> variable notation.
>
> --Jeff
> jpitblado@stata.com
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index