Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: RE: Testing for heteroscedasticity in probit models


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: RE: Testing for heteroscedasticity in probit models
Date   Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:42:24 -0000

G. E. P. Box. 
Non-normality and tests on variances. 
Biometrika 1953 40: 318-335; doi:10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.318

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Lachenbruch, Peter

Generally, testing for heteroscedasticity is fraught with danger:  in
particular something like Bartlett's test depends on normality so that a
rejection may be as much a function of non-normality as it is of unequal
variances.

George Box once wrote (around 1952, but don't rely on my memory)
"Testing for heteroscedasticity is like putting to sea in a rowboat to
see if it's safe for the Queen Mary to sail."

Gisele.Schmid@unige.ch

I am working with a probit model and I suspect heteroscedasticity.  
Before using the command -hetprob-, I would like to perform the  
Davidson and MacKinnon test for heteroscedasticity in probit models  
(Reference: Estimation and inference in Econometrics, 1993, Davidson  
and MacKinnon). Does such a test already exist in Stata? If this is  
not the case, how can I compute it?


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index