Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: respectful debate


From   Demo Crazy <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: respectful debate
Date   Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:07:41 +0000 (GMT)

interesting. Someone accusing of bad intentions (defend piracy, against all evidence) is not irrespectful for you (not mention in your message). But doubts are. Your definition seem based on who says something (list admin is never irrespectful), not on what is said.
I never doubt about inteligence. I meant it was clear for everyones reading, not preassuming.
Doubts, critical thinking are well recieved in many lists and scientific enviroments... But only if it is good for the sponsor.
Anyway if not wellcome, goodbye

Maarten buis escribió: 
> One characteristic of this list that I am very proud of is its tone. It 
> is generally respectful. I was shocked by a very unfortunate deviation 
> from this pattern where someone directly doubted someones intelligence 
> and later somebody else's good intentions. I hope we will never see such
> a discussion again.
> -- Maarten
> --------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Institut fuer Soziologie
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> 72074 Tuebingen
> Germany
> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> --------------------------



      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index