[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: -collapse- with no observations? |

Date |
Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:36:59 +0100 |

I've got to say that while Neil has a good logical case, I also regard this as a reasonable default behaviour. My guess is that usually when a -collapse- or -contract- asks for combinations that don't exist, it is the result of a typo (user didn't mean to type what was issued) or of a misconception (user thought there were some such observations). So the commands in question issue error 2000 and leave your dataset as is, which is usually what you should want to happen. I don't think an option to allow results summarising what is what for non-existent observations (zero count or missing summary statistics) would be used enough to justify hitting the code, but that's a personal view and they are naturally official commands. There are work-arounds too. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Neil Shephard I've encountered some unexpected behaviour whilst using -collapse- on different subsets of data. An example to demonstrate the problem.... sysuse auto, clear sum price collapse (count) n = mpg if(price < 2000) This results in an error as there are no cars with price < 2000... . sysuse auto, clear (1978 Automobile Data) . sum price Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- price | 74 6165.257 2949.496 3291 15906 . collapse (count) n = mpg if price < 2000 no observations r(2000); I would have expected the command to run and return a count of zero (0) as this is a valid number of counts (to my mind at least). There's a mention at http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?whatsnew10 that indicates that trying to open the data editor with an if qualifier that resulted in zero observations used to cause Stata to crash, but that has been fixed. Searching the archives/FAQ I haven't been able to find whether this has has been discussed before, or is a reasonable behaviour (as I say I would have expected to get a count of zero returned). * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: -collapse- with no observations?***From:*Neil Shephard <nshephard@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: nested forvalues loop** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: RE: Keeping trailing zeros when formatting a decimal** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: -collapse- with no observations?** - Next by thread:
**st: correlation estimates in gee** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |