Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: mfx after xtlogit


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: AW: mfx after xtlogit
Date   Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:00:26 +0200

<>


As [XT], p.226, shows, the individual effect is assumed to be drawn from a
normal distribution, but for this particular calculation, all draws from it
are assumed to be zero, i.e. the individual component in the error term is
defined away...


HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Filipa de
Castro
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. September 2009 16:14
An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Betreff: st: mfx after xtlogit

Dear all,

What exactly means the option "predict(pu0)" in mfx after xtlogit?
What does it imply that the random effect is fixed to 0?

thanks
Filipa
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index