Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Stata 11 Random Effects--Std. Errors


From   Steven Archambault <archstevej@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Stata 11 Random Effects--Std. Errors
Date   Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:26:05 -0600

Isn't this what was available in 10?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:36 AM, DE SOUZA Eric<eric.desouza@coleurope.eu> wrote:
> Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> and Mark E. Schaffer <M.E.Schaffer@hw.ac.uk> requested that there be an option to produce robust, but not cluster-robust standard errors for -xtreg, re-.
>
> We will make this option available in the future.
>
>   David
>   --ddrukker@stata.com
>
>
> To avoid confusion, David, you do mean that robust (heteroscedasticity consistent) and cluster (heteroscedasticity and serial correlation consistent) options be available separately.
>
> Eric
>
> Eric de Souza
> College of Europe
> Brugge (Bruges), Belgium
> http://www.coleurope.eu
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index