[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: AW: numeric format |

Date |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:27:38 +0200 |

<> There lies the rub. If you say table x id, you get a count of the combinations of variables involved - which is 1000 following Nick`s modification -, so you should still use the code where the mean is calculated to get a big number... HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Sandra Rayman Sent: Freitag, 14. August 2009 20:20 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: AW: numeric format Thank you. I am now able to get the example code working, but it still does not solve my problem of how, in general, to get a table in non-exponential format. For example, if (using the example) I say -table x id, format(%18.0fc)- I get: ------------------------------ | id x | 1 ----------+------------------- 1.00e+12 | 1,000 ------------------------------ And I get the same result if I say -table x id, format(%18.0fc)-. The example works, where id is just 1 throughout, but that is not the kind of table I need as it just gives the mean of the variable I am interested in. I am still trying to get a basic table (as per the comand above) with the actual numbers showing in non-exponential format. Sorry to keep bothering people with this question but I am just sure that there must be a simple way around it... Yours, Sandy. On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Nick Cox<n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > -rnormal()- was introduced during the lifetime of Stata 10. > > The FAQ new members are asked to read asks users to make clear whether they are using an out-of-date version; the current version is 11. > > The equivalent command for Stata 9.2 uses -invnormal(uniform())- > > However, as you guessed, that detail is irrelevant to your problem. > > This code worked for me with Stata 10.1. I no longer have Stata 9.2 on my machine: > > . clear > > . set obs 1000 > obs was 0, now 1000 > > . > . gen x=1e12 > > . > . gen id =_n<=5000 > > . > . table id, contents(mean x) > > ---------------------- > id | mean(x) > ----------+----------- > 1 | 1.00e+12 > ---------------------- > > . table id, contents(mean x) /* >> */ format(%18.0fc) > > ------------------------------ > id | mean(x) > ----------+------------------- > 1 | 999,999,995,904 > ------------------------------ > > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > Sandra Rayman > > Thank for for the prompt reply. I am unable to follow the suggested > code exactly as the 'rnormal' part gives me an error message that it > is an unknown function (perhaps because I am using Stata 9.2). > However, looking through the rest of the suggested code I thought that > the key part might be 'format(%11.0fc)', so I tried this but still > without success. Specifically, I tried > table date race [fweight = weight], format(%15.0fc) and several > variations of this, but the numbers are still presented in exponential > format. What am I missing here? > > Thanks for clarification or any other suggestions. > > 2009/8/14 Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>: > >> ************* >> clear* >> set obs 10000 >> >> gen x=rnormal(10000000) >> >> gen id =_n<=5000 >> >> table id, contents(mean x) >> table id, contents(mean x) /* >> */ format(%11.0fc) >> ************* > > Sandra Rayman > >> This is my first question to Statalist, and I'm afraid it's a bit of a >> basic one. I need a basic table of statistics and the problem I am >> having is that the numbers are shown in exponential rather than >> regular format. From the help function I read how to use the format >> command but the problem remains. >> >> I am using survey data and just need a basic table of the number of >> people, in each year, by race. The command I am using is: >> table date race [fweight = weight], format(%15.0g) >> >> I have tried increasing the number in the format command more and more >> (e.g. format(%18.0g)) but all that happens is that the columns get >> wider and the numbers are shown as e.g. 1.16e+07 whereas I need the >> full numbers. I know this should be easy, but from the help function >> and statalist archive I can't figure out how to do it. > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: numeric format***From:*Sandra Rayman <sandyrayman@googlemail.com>

**Re: st: AW: numeric format***From:*Sandra Rayman <sandyrayman@googlemail.com>

**RE: st: AW: numeric format***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: AW: numeric format***From:*Sandra Rayman <sandyrayman@googlemail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: VIFs under SVY command and -collin- command** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: AW: numeric format** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: AW: numeric format** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: AW: numeric format** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |