[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Cameron McIntosh <cnm100@hotmail.com> |

To |
STATA LIST <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: ?Misreported n of observations when using pweights in Stata 10 |

Date |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:11:18 -0400 |

Hi Iain, Could this be the result of different rounding for the weight variable? Cam ---------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:52:35 +0100 > From: iain.lang@pms.ac.uk > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: st: ?Misreported n of observations when using pweights in Stata 10 > > Dear List Members > > I am encountering an odd problem when using pweights in regressions in Stata 10. The problem, which I've now come across when using data from two different epidemiological studies (NHANES and the Health and Retirement Study), is that applying pweights seems to alter the number of observations reported as included in the analysis. > > An example is pasted below. When I saved this dataset in Stata 9 format and opened it there the problem did not replicate - in fact, all the outputs were the same *except* for the number of observations. Given that this has happened to me in two different datasets and in Stata 10 but not Stata 9 I'm guessing that it's something specific to Stata 10. A colleague has encountered something similar. Has anyone else come across this problem? I'm not too worried about this since the estimates, etc., are the same as in Stata 9 but if anyone else has encountered this I'd be interested to hear about it. > > With regards > Iain > > > Example output: > > . reg hrs06cog35 age gender > > Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 10478 > -------------+------------------------------ F( 2, 10475) = 206.84 > Model | 10680.3419 2 5340.17097 Prob> F = 0.0000 > Residual | 270441.234 10475 25.8177789 R-squared = 0.0380 > -------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.0378 > Total | 281121.576 10477 26.8322588 Root MSE = 5.0811 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > hrs06cog35 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] > -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- > age | -.121624 .0061161 -19.89 0.000 -.1336128 -.1096353 > gender | .5013875 .1005095 4.99 0.000 .3043697 .6984053 > _cons | 29.77283 .4344999 68.52 0.000 28.92113 30.62454 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > . svyset [pweight=EWGTR] > > pweight: EWGTR > VCE: linearized > Single unit: missing > Strata 1: > SU 1: > FPC 1: > > . svy: reg hrs06cog35 age gender > (running regress on estimation sample) > > Survey: Linear regression > > Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 27821 > Number of PSUs = 27821 Population size = 15217686 > Design df = 27820 > F( 2, 27819) = 51.63 > Prob> F = 0.0000 > R-squared = 0.0203 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > | Linearized > hrs06cog35 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] > -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- > age | -.1533668 .0207634 -7.39 0.000 -.194064 -.1126695 > gender | .8502326 .1253616 6.78 0.000 .6045176 1.095948 > _cons | 32.94872 1.376334 23.94 0.000 30.25104 35.64641 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ _________________________________________________________________ Stay in the loop and chat with friends, right from your inbox! http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671354 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: ?Misreported n of observations when using pweights in Stata 10***From:*Iain Lang <iain.lang@pms.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: New package -fvregen- on SSC** - Next by Date:
**st: Problem in factor analysis & Cronbach's alpha** - Previous by thread:
**st: ?Misreported n of observations when using pweights in Stata 10** - Next by thread:
**st: Can I apply -treatreg- if the endogenous variable is continuous?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |