[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Cameron McIntosh <cnm100@hotmail.com> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: Endogeneity in Bivariate Probit |

Date |
Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:26:23 -0400 |

Hi Alejandra, So if I understand your model specification correctly, it is along the lines of some mediational model (let's say the underlying response variate y2* is the mediator between some IV X and the ultimate outcome y1*): y1* = alpha1 + betaX + betaY2* + e1 y2* = alpha2 + betaX + e2 Then you are asking if a test of cov(e1,e2) = 0 under the 'biprobit' is equivalent to a Hausman test of endogeneity. Indeed, the Knapp and Seakes (1998) paper is oft-cited in the bivariate probit context for this purpose, but I am not 100% sure if it can be invoked in this case. (I could be wrong). Mediational models bring in a number of issues about the proper direction of causal flow among the variables in the system. Of course, cov(e1,e2) = 0 is necessary for getting good overall empirical model fit (implying, for example, that no common causes of y1* and y2* have been omitted), and thus unbiased estimates, but I don'[t know if this automatically implies endogeneity in the sense that cov(y2*,e1) = 0 (unless X is being regarded as an instrument here), and I believe that more is involved for convincingly demonstrating the properness of the postulated causal chain. I would suggest having a look at: James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., & Brett, J.M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 233-244. Further, quantifying the degree of mediation in probit (and logit) models is more complicated than in the linear case: MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Brown C.H., Wang W., & Hoffman M. (2007). The intermediate endpoint effect in logistic and probit regression. Clinical Trials, 4(5), 499-513. For more general readings on mediation see: MacKinnon, D.P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. MacKinnon, D. P., & Fairchild, A. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 16-20. Hope this is helpful, and that I have understood the situation correctly. Cam > Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:51:20 +0200 > Subject: st: Endogeneity in Bivariate Probit > From: mmolina@uniroma3.it > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > > Dear Statalist, > I found on the Statist archive that Knapp and Seaks argue that a > likelihood-ratio test of the correlation coefficient of the residuals > (rho) can be used as an endogeneity test. > On the other hand I read that if "the second dependent variable, y2, > appears on the right-hand side of the first equation, this is a recursive, > simultaneous-equations model. Surprisingly, the endogenous nature of one > of the variables on the right-hand side of the first equation can be > ignored in formulating the log-likelihood" (Greene, 2002, pp.715). > I run my model for three countries and only in one case I obtained these > results: > > Likelihood-ratio test of rho = 0 : chi2(1) = 2,1962 > Prob> chi(2) = 0,1383 > > Should I consider that y2 variable have passed the endogeneity test? > Thanks in advance and regards, > Alejandra Molina > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ Stay on top of things, check email from other accounts! Check it out. _________________________________________________________________ Stay in the loop and chat with friends, right from your inbox! http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671354 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Endogeneity in Bivariate Probit***From:*mmolina@uniroma3.it

- Prev by Date:
**Re: RE: st: RE: RE: what does _N mean under by varlist in the -egen- and -gen-?** - Next by Date:
**st: interpret output from mim & xtmixed** - Previous by thread:
**st: Endogeneity in Bivariate Probit** - Next by thread:
**st: interpret output from mim & xtmixed** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |